Details
-
Type:
Bug
-
Status:
Closed
-
Priority:
Major
-
Resolution: Not A Bug
-
Affects Version/s: 1.12
-
Fix Version/s: None
-
Component/s: None
-
Labels:None
-
Number of attachments :
Description
the Javasource output from the JavaDocBuilder does not show the actual code (some reformatting)
package de.lgohlke.qdox;
import java.io.File;
import java.io.IOException;
import org.junit.Test;
import com.thoughtworks.qdox.JavaDocBuilder;
import com.thoughtworks.qdox.model.JavaClass;
import com.thoughtworks.qdox.model.JavaSource;
public class QdoxBug
{
@Test
public void testBug() throws IOException
{
File file = new File("src/test/java/de/lgohlke/qdox/QdoxBug.java");
JavaSource source = new JavaDocBuilder().addSource(file);
for (JavaClass clazz : source.getClasses())
{
System.out.println(clazz.getSource().toString());
}
}
}
this is really annoying, can it be fixed?
Activity
Robert Scholte
made changes -
| Field | Original Value | New Value |
|---|---|---|
| Testcase included | yes |
It looks like you're talking about two different things.
First of all: QDox was created to be able to parse java-code and construct a model with it. It's actually a feature that QDox can write this model to a file. The model doesn't keep any formatting information.
With QDox-2.0 it will be possible to define your own writer, which means you have full control of how a generated file should look like.
The line numbers you're talking about are based on the *source*file, not the file generated by QDox.
Robert Scholte
added a comment - It looks like you're talking about two different things.
First of all: QDox was created to be able to parse java-code and construct a model with it. It's actually a feature that QDox can write this model to a file. The model doesn't keep any formatting information.
With QDox-2.0 it will be possible to define your own writer, which means you have full control of how a generated file should look like.
The line numbers you're talking about are based on the *source*file, not the file generated by QDox. Ok, I relying heavily on the feature to write out.
But the source code is not as read, but it seems be so this is kind of error-prone.
So best would be to have a standard not changing writer. The writer concept seems for me the best solution for that.
Anyway great work! When it comes the time, that are users complaining because of additional features, u did a really good job 
Lars K. W. Gohlke
added a comment - Ok, I relying heavily on the feature to write out.
But the source code is not as read, but it seems be so this is kind of error-prone.
So best would be to have a standard not changing writer. The writer concept seems for me the best solution for that.
Anyway great work! When it comes the time, that are users complaining because of additional features, u did a really good job FYI: QDox-2.0 won't be backwards compatible with previous versions. It requires java5 and uses Lists with generics instead of arrays. There are still a few things I'd like to change, so maybe I'll start releasing a few alpha's somewhere soon.
But could you be more specific. I don't see a test or two examples of what you get and what you would have expected. Just to be sure so I can close this issue.
Robert Scholte
added a comment - FYI: QDox-2.0 won't be backwards compatible with previous versions. It requires java5 and uses Lists with generics instead of arrays. There are still a few things I'd like to change, so maybe I'll start releasing a few alpha's somewhere soon.
But could you be more specific. I don't see a test or two examples of what you get and what you would have expected. Just to be sure so I can close this issue. Just adjust the Path for this test (it reads itself) and see the output.
It differs, else I could write an explicit test.
Lars K. W. Gohlke
added a comment - Just adjust the Path for this test (it reads itself) and see the output.
It differs, else I could write an explicit test. Robert Scholte
made changes -
| Status | Open [ 1 ] | Closed [ 6 ] |
| Assignee | Robert Scholte [ rfscholte ] | |
| Resolution | Not A Bug [ 6 ] |
I found the line number from other parser are not matching the qdox numbers.