Details
-
Type:
Improvement
-
Status:
Closed
-
Priority:
Major
-
Resolution: Fixed
-
Affects Version/s: None
-
Fix Version/s: 2.0
-
Component/s: None
-
Labels:None
-
Number of attachments :
Description
According to http://java.sun.com/docs/books/jls/third_edition/html/names.html#25430 an FQN is more than just the (class)name of an object. It should also contain the array information if it's there.
Don't think this should be fixed during any 1.x-release, since it might break the code of the depending projects. Some of them already handle array-appending by themselves.
The spec doesn't say anything about generics here, so that's still something we have to figure out.
Activity
Robert Scholte
made changes -
| Field | Original Value | New Value |
|---|---|---|
| Status | Open [ 1 ] | Resolved [ 5 ] |
| Assignee | Robert Scholte [ rfscholte ] | |
| Resolution | Fixed [ 1 ] |
Fixed in rev. 1267
Show
Robert Scholte
added a comment - Fixed in rev. 1267
Robert Scholte
added a comment - Fixed in rev. 1267 Robert Scholte
made changes -
| Status | Resolved [ 5 ] | Closed [ 6 ] |
Also added Type.getComponentType() to get the actual (Java)Class. Migration docs have been updated too.